● ADVISORY · PROJECT HELIOS

Demonstration Edition

The value moves
to the grid.
Strategic repositioning of an integrated utility.

Anonymised demonstration case “Project Helios” · European power market · based on publicly available market data — not a real engagement. Advisory edition with a standalone Executive Recommendation.

Package
Advisory
Industry
Energy · integrated utility
Case type
Anonymised (codename “Project Helios”)
Deliverable logic
Advisory → standalone Executive Recommendation
Prepared by
Rivalerra — Energy & Utilities Intelligence

Key figures (modelled)

~€2.4bn
Revenue (modelled)
~1.6m
Customer points
~55 %
EBITDA from regulated grid
+~60 %
Power demand by 2030

● KEY FINDINGS

Three findings set the strategic agenda.

01

The market is growing — but not everywhere.

European power market grows at ~3.7 % CAGR to roughly $436bn by 2034 — growth concentrates in grids and flexibility, not in classic commodity supply.

02

Helios sits right — and wrong at the same time.

~55 % of EBITDA comes from the regulated grid, the growing value pool. At the same time the commodity business ties up capital in a segment with declining margin.

03

Flexibility is the underestimated lever.

Grid flexibility value rises to up to €5bn per year by 2030. Linking grid and flexibility services into a platform defends margin where it is actually created.

Options assessment — three paths, one decision

Assessment axes: growth connection, margin quality, capital tie-up, feasibility.

Lever / OptionRationaleVerdict
A — Commodity defenderHold supply market share, grid as a side actrejected
B — Grid-&-flex platformGrid + flexibility + customer-near services as an integrated platformrecommended
C — Pure gridFocus on the regulated grid, give up supplyrejected

● SCOPE & METHODOLOGY

How this analysis is built.

Scope
European power market · value pool model 2030 · anonymised case
Methodology
Public market data · structured value-pool model · options assessment across 4 axes
Deliverables
Executive intelligence report · value pool analysis · options assessment · recommendation
Storyline
Market → Starting position → Options → Central finding → Recommendation

Central finding

Project Helios sits structurally right (grid) but is portfolio-weighted wrong (commodity). The value of the coming decade lies in linking grid and flexibility into a platform — not in defending commodity market share.

Strategic core statement

“Helios does not need to reinvent where it earns — it needs to stop tying up its resources where the market is shrinking.”

— Rivalerra Consulting · Energy & Utilities Intelligence

Sources

  • [1] Straits Research / IEA — market size & growth, European power market.
  • [2] IEA — power demand, electrification and renewables build-out in Europe.
  • [3] EIB / IEA — grid investment need in Europe (~€1.4 trillion).
  • [4] ENTSO-E — value of grid flexibility (up to ~€5bn per year by 2030).
  • [5] European Commission — regulatory framework for the power market & grids.

Abstracted and anonymised representation of methodological analytical work (demonstration project). No confidential client, partner or project information. “Project Helios” is a fictitious codename; company-specific figures are illustrative demonstration values.

Download portfolio case (PDF) ↓

This case is currently available as a German document only. An English edition is in preparation.

● DELIVERABLE PREVIEW

Excerpts from the portfolio case.

Selected pages of the publicly released portfolio case — condensed, calmly composed, executive-oriented.

Cover of the Project Helios portfolio case
Page 01 / 12Portfolio case · cover
Three tensions that carry the decision

Management summary

Three tensions that carry the decision

01

The commodity core delivers cash flow but is structurally eroding, while the regulated grid business carries the growth. Added to that: asset-heavy generation against regulated returns, and the pace of transformation against balance-sheet discipline.

The starting position

Key figures

The starting position

02

Around €2.4bn revenue and some 1.6m customer connections, with roughly 55% of EBITDA from the regulated grid. Market anchors alongside: around 1,600 GW of EU renewable capacity by 2030 and grid investment needs of some €1.4tn.

Where the value sits in 2030

Value pools

Where the value sits in 2030

03

The modelled value distribution shows the shift unambiguously: regulated grids form the largest value pool, while customer-facing services and flexibility grow fastest. Commodity retail is eroding and conventional generation ties up capital without regulatory protection.

Three options, one recommendation

Option evaluation

Three options, one recommendation

04

Option A (commodity defender), B (grid and flexibility platform) and C (pure grid) are assessed against value potential, regulatory protection, balance-sheet stability, customer interface and feasibility. Option B dominates A on regulatory protection and C on value scope.

EBITDA path and sensitivity

Business case

EBITDA path and sensitivity

05

The fully modelled path contrasts the base case, a pessimistic variant and the no-transformation scenario. The downside is what matters: the regulated anchor carries it, while without transformation EBITDA falls back markedly.

Four directions across three horizons

Executive recommendation

Four directions across three horizons

06

Direct capital into regulated grids, build a flexibility platform, scale customer-facing services and wind down commodity in a controlled way — as a bespoke strategy with a roadmap and a fully modelled business case, as only an advisory mandate provides.

Project inquiry

Start your
project inquiry.

Begin by selecting a time for a confidential introductory call. Then briefly outline your project, shortly you will receive an initial assessment and a concrete package recommendation.

What clients can expect

  • ✓Response shortly
  • ✓Clear package recommendation
  • ✓Transparent fixed pricing
  • ✓No hidden additional costs
  • ✓Results from 48 hours possible
  • ✓Single dedicated point of contact

Step 1 of 8

Onboarding

Schedule an introductory call

Select a suitable time to confidentially discuss your strategic question, objectives and analysis scope.

Duration

30 minutes

Format

Video or phone call

Confidentiality

Confidential, non-binding, NDA on request.

Select a date

None of the suggested times work for you? Select a specific date and review the available time slots.

Available times

Please select a date first.

Time zone Europe/Berlin

From Berlin. For ambitious companies.

Before the first call

Answers on process, commitment and confidentiality.

Other enquiries

For press, partnership or general enquiries, please contact us at contact@rivalerra-consulting.com.